One thing that amazes me is the amount of copying of other peoples work and just he copy and paste mentality that happens in students assessments. Why is it that universities put in place systems that will help prevent the copying and pasting of students work and websites but schools don't Are we not preparing our students?
A couple of months ago I put onto a listserve the question -
I have had a request by English and Social Studies Departments to
look at how plagiarism detection could be used with students handing in
work. As with assessments now and the internet students could just use
the copy and paste method to handin an assessment. What modules are
schools using other than turnitin.
Turnitin - the most popular option but it is expensive to maintain the license.
To which I received:
Turnitin is definately the most widely used here in NZ - another
option for Moodle that integrates really well and is cheaper than
Turnitin is Urkund:
http://moodle.org/plugins/view.php?plugin=plagiarism_urkund
They are really good to work with and focus purely on the plagiarism
detection service and the reporting is just as good as Turnitin - the
biggest drawback is that their database of student submitted content
isn't as big as Turnitin's, but their comparison against web content
seems just as good.
Another option I'm keen to investigate further for NZ clients is the
open source tool "crot" - there's a plugin available but it's not ready
for mainstream/production use - it relies too much on the moodle server
(causes a big performance hit) and doesn't cope too well with large
numbers of submissions. I've been hoping to get some funding to tidy it
up and turn it into structure so we could set up an NZ based "Crot"
server - then a group of Moodle sites could connect to the single
"server", share the hosting cost and enable a "NZ database" of submitted
student files to be stored centrally for comparison. It also relies
heavily on the Bing search engine and if the Terms & conditions of
using their API change it could mean the web-search functionality was no
longer available - it needs to allow other Search engine API plugins.
If anyone is interested in helping to fund some development on Crot to allow it to be used on a production site,
Now we have an issue, bing have changed there terms and conditions...
Link to version 2.0+ versions of crot http://moodle.org/plugins/view.php?plugin=plagiarism_crot
and the terms and conditions of the bing API have changed, only allowed 5,000 queries per month free, else it starts to cost.
https://datamarket.azure.com/dataset/5BA839F1-12CE-4CCE-BF57-A49D98D29A44
However, there is a crotpro available now - http://beta.noplagiarism.org/ that now allows for a free trial.
Tuesday, 22 May 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment